[Artemisia] Fw: Proposed change to Royaltymembershiprequirements

[LadyPDC at aol.com]

Hmmm, ok having read everything written so far, I come to the following  
conclusions:
 
1. Anyone who cannot both afford at least two years membership and  calculate 
what that would be and what is needed to prove it and by what time,  likely 
does not possess the financial stability and the ability to plan and  schedule 
that I would consider to be the minimum I would hope to find in  standing 
royalty.
 
2.  I must agree with Morgan (rare but hey it does happen) that the  BOD 
should require the same thing of themselves since they have at least as much  
effect, if not more, on the game we play.  However, I will also admit that  I 
haven't checked the requirements for a member of the BOD so will leave open  the 
possibility that such a requirement is already in place.
 
3.  It would seem to me that the requirement proposed of proving to  have 
prepaid membership for the entirety of the proposed reign would prevent  some 
obviously very emotional and potentially damaging cases that have occurred  up to 
now.  So (an even more rare occasion), I agree in this case with the  
proposal of the BOD.
 
Ok, I am going to crawl off the soapbox and back under my rock where, after  
all of this "agreement", I will institute a DNA test to insure that I  really 
am still ....
 
 
Constance de la Rose, OL

Barony of Loch  Salaan
Kingdom of Artemisia

"Remember, it should also be  fun"
**************New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026)