[Artemisia] [Fwd: [Announcements] Request for Comment - Competitor-Consort Proposal]

Jackman-Brink, Julia Julia.Jackman-Brink at mso.umt.edu
Fri Nov 2 08:51:46 CDT 2012


While I personally think this is two separate issues being rolled into one, comments should be sent to the Board at their address for comments (see write up).  As much as we like dialog here at home, stuff from this list will never reach the ones who need to hear. 

Juliana

-----Original Message-----
From: artemisia-bounces at lists.gallowglass.org [mailto:artemisia-bounces at lists.gallowglass.org] On Behalf Of morganblaidddu at yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 10:55 PM
To: Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list
Subject: [Artemisia] RE: [Fwd: [Announcements] Request for Comment - Competitor-Consort Proposal]

My thoughts-

 

One of the most basic rules of all Crown/Coronet lists in the Society is that “the entrants must be acceptable to the Crown”.  With that in mind, combining these two rules is basically saying we want to make sure that a same-sex couple entering the list are indeed a couple, and not a pair of fighters thinking to double their chances of winning, i.e. we want to ensure that Duke Fred and Duke Bob aren’t trying to sweep the list [note: if there are any Dukes out there named Bob and/or Fred, I don’t mean you].  The thing is, no matter who the consort is, whether or not both are fighting, no fighter can be *sure* that they will win, unless they plan on cheating [rhino-hiding, weeble-ing ,bullet-proof,  whatever you call it, it’s cheating] , and we all know that our Crown’s would NOT find those fighters to be acceptable entrants.  I think the first rule is about 4.5 decades overdue, and the second rule denies way too many fighters the chance to show their love and respect for their consorts.  Consider this, if this rule had been in effect when we began, we could not have had the LEGENDARY fight that gave us the First Queen by Right of Arms.

 

Baron Morgan Blaidd Du,

old guy


  Sent: ‎November‎ ‎1‎, ‎2012 ‎9‎:‎48‎ ‎PM
To: artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
Subject: [Artemisia] [Fwd: [Announcements] Request for Comment - Competitor-Consort Proposal]
 

An FYI......

Katya
Kingdom Seneschal


---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: [Announcements] Request for Comment - Competitor-Consort Proposal
From:    ea at sca.org
Date:    Thu, November 1, 2012 12:02 pm
To:      announcements at lists.sca.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On July 17, 2012 the Board distributed to the membership for its comments the following proposed change to Corpora:

Current language reads:

Each comptitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a consort of the opposite gender.

Proposed change for commentary reads:

Each competitor in a Royal List must be fighting for a prospective consort of the opposite sex unless the Crown has elected to permit a competitor to fight for a prospective consort of the same sex.

Commentary on this language is being accepted until December 1, 2012.

After additional discussion, the Board has decided to submit the following additional proposed change for commentary. These proposed changes, if both are approved, would work together to address the intent behind allowing same-sex couples to have the opportunity to enter a royal list to fight for the honor of their inspiration.

Corpora IV. B. 4.

No one may take part in a Royal Lists as both competitor and prospective consort.

Commentary on this secondary language will be accepted until March 1, 2013. Please use the title "Competitor-Consort Proposal" in the Subject line.

While these proposed changes, if both are approved, would work together to address the intent behind allowing same-sex couples to have the opportunity to enter a royal list to fight for the honor of their inspiration, it must again be stressed that no decisions have been yet been made. The Board may approve or reject one or both of the proposed changes and will make a decision on each proposed change when its individual comment period is over. The Board’s current intention is to not delay a decision on the first proposed change while the comment period for the second proposed change runs its course.



Comments are strongly encouraged and can be sent to:
SCA Inc.
Box 360789
Milpitas,  CA 95036

You may also email comments at lists.sca.org.

This announcement is an official informational release by the Society for Creative Anachronism , Inc.  Permission is granted to reproduce this announcement in its entirety in newsletters, websites and electronic mailing lists.

_______________________________________________
Announcements mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.sca.org/listinfo/announcements

To change the email address you receive these messages at, visit the URL listed above, subscribe to with your new email address.  Once this is completed, return to the URL listed above and unsubscribe your old email address.

_______________________________________________
Artemisia mailing list
Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
_______________________________________________
Artemisia mailing list
Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia


More information about the Artemisia mailing list