<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tempus Sans ITC'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">> The thought for discussion- how do you define "Prowess" for each of the</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tempus Sans ITC'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">> Peerages?</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I think rather than doing specific definitions you may want to consider "Prowess" as being the measuring stick that everybody uses to compare themselves against. More of the “I want to be 'THAT GOOD' kind of attitude.”<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Void of any other consideration, is the individual talented in the discipline or not?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">In my opinion, those who define “Prowess” for their discipline (with some rare & noted exceptions) probably should be peers.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because competition creates a better product and it’s the best of the fighters, costumers and other disciplines that pushes the SCA forward.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Michael<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree">Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard</a>