<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6487.1">
<TITLE>Largesse</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Therasia wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"><snipped dictionary definition of largesse></FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">>That's right: largesse - in period, the tool of the left-handed put-down </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> of one's social inferiors through the giving of money or goods. The difference </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">> between largesse and generosity is the difference between Carnegie and Smithson. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Actually Therasia, the etymology of largesse listed does not correspond to the definition given. That definition is the modern definition, or in other words how it's meaning got changed through time. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">A quick internet search brings this up (</FONT><A HREF="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=largesse&r=67"><U><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=largesse&r=67</FONT></U></A><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">"[Middle English largesse, from Old French, from large, generous, from Latin largus.]"</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Stress *generous*, nothing about being a put-down. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">From the same page…</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">"Largess \Lar"gess\, Largesse \Lar"gesse\, n. [F. largesse, fr. large. See Large, a.] 1. Liberality; generosity; bounty. [Obs.]"</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Here we see the "period" or obscure definition given. Still no mention of it being a put-down issue, left-handed or otherwise.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Unfortunately I'm at work now and can't break out Lull, DeChargny, et al to give their actual medieval in-context definitions verbatim, or even Maurice Keen's dissected definition of Largesse from period, but from what I can remember they make no mention of it being "left-handed" or a "put-down" or anything of similar meaning. I will give you that Largesse did sometimes mean helping those in need, and in period that may have meant giving to those in a lower station (although I am dubious as to how often that may have actually happened). I think this corresponds to the sense Noblesse Oblige (we'll get back to that). But it was also standard practice that you were expected to host visiting nobility, especially higher-ups. This would also be Largesse.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Now it can be argued that Noblesse Oblige is simply a nice way of saying "left-handed put-down of one's social inferiors." But then by following that logic fairly closely you could say the same thing about philanthropy. I guess my point is that Largesse can be seen a put-down, or even used as a put-down, but I everything that I have read from primary sources leads me to believe that it didn't actually mean that. And more importantly, it shouldn't be interpreted that way into the SCA context especially if you subscribe to the idea of "the middle ages as they should have been" and you take the virtues of chivalry at face value.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I do think you raise a valid point that the virtues of chivalry espoused in the middle of our period may not be the best way to rate Peers, and as I have said earlier in this discussion, everyone's going to have a different list of criteria, some based on earlier or later period philosophies, some from their own modern gut, and most I think with a combination. That's fine and there's no way to change that. But I think there is some value in delving into the virtues as expressed by Lull, DeChargny and their relative contemporaries, and I also think that it is a fine jumping off point for people to *begin* thinking about peer criteria, but it's foolish to believe that it will ever be or should be the only yardstick.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Gregory</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>