[EKStationers] FW: SCA made books
Christopher Bogs
cbogs at pobox.upenn.edu
Wed Aug 3 10:05:20 CDT 2005
Greetings, good gentles --
The following is reposted from the SCA Scribes' list with the kind
permission of the author; it's more related to the scribal arts but is
important for anyone who does both C&I and bookmaking, or who wants to bind
illuminated and calligraphed work. It's written by Master Ranthulfr, an
excellent scribe from the Midrealm who has lots of experience working with
period pigments and techniques.
Yrs.,
Christoph
-----Original Message-----
From: scribes-bounces at castle.org [mailto:scribes-bounces at castle.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Asplund
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:57 AM
To: Scribes
Subject: [Scribes] SCA made books
Hi folks,
This is a long one, but worth it if you are thinking about making a book....
There have been some people doing marvelous things with making period
style books in recent years. More and more people are taking on this
kind of huge project (myself included), and I would like to pass on a
few words of advice that you may find helpful.
As already mentioned, I was one of quite a few scribes who worked on the
Middle Kingdom's Great Book of Ceremonies (aka the MK Great Boke),
created around 1986. We are all just really damned proud of that big ol'
thing. However, being one of the first of it's kind (I think THE first
such SCA sponsored project), there were some hard lessons to be learned.
This just came up on the Midlaurel list, so I figured I'd tell you what
I told them (plus some).
!) The book "could" have been half the number of pages. It was only
written and painted on the recto (right hand page). So every verso (back
side) was left blank. This did two things: First, it compromised the
medieval look of the interior (which nobody really noticed much), and
second, it saved the book from ruin.
What? Yes, the book would have been a disaster in a few years if it had
been painted on both sides of the page. Now I am not saying that you
should only paint one side of the page! Oh, no! You SHOULD use both
sides, but I'll tell you why this happened so you can do a work around.
Several years after the book was made, I was given the task of getting
the remaining blank pages filled in with appropriate ceremonies, etc.
that had been left out when the book was bound. While I had the book
back, I was able to inspect it closely and I found that a fair bit of
color had transferred from the painted sides to the unpainted facing
pages. If this had happened to a book written and illuminated on both
sides, the book would have been ruined.
So why did it happen? It was a combination of the paper being a bit too
absorbent and the paints being unmodified watercolors and gouaches.
We used Rising brand two-ply "vellum surface" paper. The people planning
the book (big round of applause for the hard work of Mistress Grahdne!)
were very careful and conscientious to pick what they thought was the
best material possible for the purpose. Here's where it went wrong: We
had lots of experience making calligraphy and illuminations for award
scrolls that would go into frames, but we had no experience with the
same materials going into the compression of a book.
You see, watercolors and gouaches are designed for framed artwork. They
have enough binder to hold them on the paper, but not so much as to
prevent them from sinking into the fibers as well. This dissipates some
of the adhesive potential, but it also causes a penetration that is hard
to remove. Pigments work into the fibers. But when the fluid carries the
binder down into the paper, some of the pigment particles of bodied
pigments (non-stain based colors) stay on the surface with less
surrounding binder than they need. This makes a weaker paint film. Both
watercolor and gouache are somewhat weaker in the tempering medium
anyway (meaning they contain a low amount of the gum arabic binder), so
they will become more susceptible to rubbing away under friction.
How to get around this?
I suggest that when picking a paper, you pick one that has a little more
sizing in the paper. The "sizing" is the term for the binding glue in
the paper that holds the fibers together. This seals the surface from
deep penetration of the fluids in the colors, so the binder will tend to
stay on the surface with the color. Then, test the paints on a like page
as you use them to be sure they can withstand the friction and
compression of being in a book If you still find the paints are rubbing
off, you will need to add a little more binding medium to the paint.
To add more binder to store bought watercolors or gouaches, all you need
is some gum arabic fluid and some wet paint. Squeeze paint from the tube
into a shell or plastic watercolor well. Then add a little binding
medium and THEN enough water to make it fluid enough to test a swatch
on the same type of paper you are using. When dry, test the sample by
rubbing hard with the same paper. Add a little binder at a time because
you don't want to overbind the paint. Overbinding causes the paint to
look too transparent, and it can lead to brittle paint film. If you WANT
a thinner paint from lots of binder, you will need to add a hint of
sugar (fine powdered or honey), but test this too, because over
abundance of sweetener can make the paint not dry and stay sticky.
Don't worry. It may sound complicated, but it isn't really, and after
you do it a few times it becomes second nature. The medieval artist did
this all the time.
CAUTION: There are different ways to get gum arabic. Winsor & Newton
sells two types. One is with an acid preservative, and one is without.
The acid will change some acid sensitive pigments such as ultramarine.
Another way to buy it is in the crystal "tears." These look like drops
of amber, and can be found at specialist grocery stores and middle
eastern and Indian food stores, sold as "edible gum" (this type is a mix
of clear to reddish, but works). It is also sold as clearer yellowish
drops from special art supply stores like Kremer Pigments. You can also
buy Gum Arabic powder from some health food stores, and this is cheaper
and very clean stuff. You just mix it with warm water and let it soften.
Strain if needed.
2) I don't know why the MK's Great Book was originally planned for being
only worked on the recto. I seem to remember that it may have been
because of the way the assignments were made. Each artist was given a
chapter of ceremony or listing, and enough paper bofolios (the spread)
to do the work. This allowed the artists to do their whole "gathering"
in as many single pages as it took, and more pages could be added by
folding a bifolio and adding it to the binding as if it was it's own
quire (gathering).
This would make binding it a nightmare of stitching, and I would suggest
using a more authentic manner would be better, even though it would
require more patience.
Folks, if you want to make a better book, it really makes sense to write
out the whole thing first (on both sides of the page), leaving openings
for illustration. Have fewer people write it, and give them larger
sections so they are writing in full quires (gatherings of four quires
(spreads) nested together. Then give those pages to as many illuminators
to decorate as you wish. They can be the same artist, or teams of
artists. The calligraphy always takes less time than the illumination
anyway. This will make the project much more manageable, and the look
will be more authentic.
Well, enough for now, I need to make shoes or I will be barefoot at
Pennsic! (No big deal, since I go barefoot at Pennsic a lot anyway....)
RanthulfR
--
VISIT RandyAsplund.com
To see a Universe of art ranging from Magic: The Gathering
to Star Trek and Medieval Manuscripts:
Original Art & Prints for sale!
Randy Asplund (734) 663-0954
Science Fiction and Fantasy Illustration
2101 S. Circle Dr., Ann Arbor, MI. 48103
More information about the Ekstationers
mailing list