[Artemisia] Re: thought for discussion-

[Morgan Wolf]

Oooh, I'm a "Luv"!


Sorry, I work weekends, listening to people whine about thier satellite TV
not working, so I won't be able to make Collegium, but I know I speak for
the whole Shire of Stan Wyrm when I say we'd love to have you, and El
Hermoso, and anyone else you feel like bringing, join us for Yule Revel on
12/6.  You could display and/or judge in our Shire A&S Championship.

AS for prowess, peerages, etc., it appears I should re-state my idea behind
starting this discussion-

I hope to get input in defining the Five Pillars of Peerage, so that folks
have more information on what they should be looking for when they start
considering recommending people for awards.  I agree with you [and Conrad,
Juliana, et al] that one has to consider ALL of the Pillars as a whole, not
indiviually, but separating makes it easier to define each one [in theory].

Morgan Blaidd Du
Protege and Ghillie to
Baron James Ulrich MacKellar and
Baroness Rachel Ashton

Fei g'wneir
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Helm-Clark" <no1home at onewest.net>
To: <artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Artemisia] Re: thought for discussion-


>
> > Therasia, an individual's opinion of themself is not a defining quality
for
> > Peerage.  No matter how good Bubba thinks he is as a fighter, unless the
>
> But Morgan, Luv, that's not what I wrote. I wasn't writing about peerage,
> I was writing about prowess - which can be an entirely different thing
> all together...
> see you at collegium Morgan?  I promise I'll try to behave and not
> be bratty
> (well, not too much, at least...   ;-)
>
> ttfn
> Therasia
> _______________________________________________
> Artemisia mailing list
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
>