[Artemisia] Re: Thought for discussion

[Michele Konechny]

I love this discussion.

(snip)
>>not everyone has had the opportunity to hear the definitions that I have, 
>>we've already determined that I don't remember it correctly so I need a 
>>refresher, and the idea behind the discussion was to get input on the 
>>definitions and give people a rough sketch of what is considered by Peers 
>>and what they should consider before recommending someone.
>

Though I understand the hesitation of some to try and nail down what defines 
a peer, I am still fairly new to the SCA and really appreciate what I have 
learned from this discussion.

>
>I thought it was a good idea, but it wouldn't be the first time I was 
>wrong. :-)
>
I think it still is a great idea.  Now that we have heard so much of 
prowess, might we move on to another term?  Largess (sp?) perhaps?

Morrigan

_________________________________________________________________
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games