[Artemisia] Fwd: Sca Growth---soon we shall rule the world!---

Chuck Heisler Jr. conradvz at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 25 12:38:34 CST 2004


Hi and thanks for the response,
 
I would point out that we have more people than both the Kingdoms of Ealdormere and Lochac!  Interesting.
 
I guess I'm with the group that says a membership is a membership as far as the kingdom status goes.
 
Not that I expect us to have a lot of say in that final decision.  But I was still pretty impressed that we had 700 plus members of any kind.
 
C.

ravenmacleod at comcast.net wrote:
As per your request your Excellency, 

This number reflects the total number of members in the kingdom including Sustaining, Family and all other membership types. If we consider that say 20% of the members of our kingdom are associated with say 2 family members (a spouse and a child) that's approximately 320 members subtract that from our 790 and you get 470 dangerously close to the threshold limit. When you look at other kingdoms member base you see that there is a tremendous difference take out 790 and compare it to our neighbors in the Outlands base of 1567 or even the next highest number base to ours of Trimaris at 1237 you can see what can make people nervous. 

Cause for concern? Perhaps. 

What can we do? Bring a friend, bring a neighbor, answer the question "are you guys in a play?" with a cheerful and informative attitude. We have a great heart here in these sovereign lands and that is simple to loose sight of in this world driven by numbers, the more generous we are with sharing that spirit the sooner that these issues of how many and of what type will become a thing of the past. 

Humbly in your service,
HL Raven MacLeod
Seneschal. Loch Salann
Sergeant to the Barony Ashton
Vassal to James Ulric MacKeller

The opinions expressed above are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Barony of Loch Salann or other mentioned in this missive.
> I think those low/mid 400 numbers are for Sustaining members, so I'm curious, if 
> this 790 number is being tracked, why we were all so panicky about the 
> sustaining member number?
> 
> Anybody know and willing to shed light on that?
> 
> Seneschals? Anyone? 
> 
> Jeff Webster wrote:
> As a matter of fact, yes I am.
> last time I heard about numbers they were in the low to mid 400's
> This 790 number is quite refreshing, at least to me.
> 
> Ulric
> 
> 
> >From: "Chuck Heisler Jr." 
> >Reply-To: Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list 
> >
> >To: Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list 
> >Subject: Re: [Artemisia] Fwd: Sca Growth---soon we shall rule the world!---
> >Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:15:29 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >Artemesia - 790
> >
> >
> >Anyone else pleasantly surprised by this number?
> >
> >CvZ
> >
> >Mala wrote:
> >
> >yes yes its all acording to plan!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Artemisia mailing list
> >Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> >http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar – FREE! 
> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Artemisia mailing list
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> _______________________________________________
> Artemisia mailing list
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia

_______________________________________________
Artemisia mailing list
Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.


More information about the Artemisia mailing list