[Artemisia] Re: [cathedral] Comments regarding latest BoD announcment

[Dan S.]

> Sir Dan,
>
> I only have one point to bring up from your post
>
> Dan S. wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah right, when was the last time an R&D or sanction vote by the BoD was
>> not unanimous or unanimous with abstentions? I'll save you the trouble of
>> looking it up. Never.
>>
> You say there has never been an R&D that was not  either unanimous or 
> unanimous with abstentions.
>
> Then you go on to say:
>
>>
>> They have been handing out about 5 R&D's and sanctions per meeting,
>> sometimes as high as 8, sometimes just 1 or 2. There have probably been 
>> over
>> 100 sanctions and R&D's, maybe even 200+ for all I know.
>>
> You say in this point that you aren't sure how many sanctions and R&Ds 
> have occurred.
>
> You suggest that you have checked the votes on every single R&D yet you 
> have no idea how many R&Ds have occurred?
>
> This would appear to be either sloppy research or you are simply full of 
> __it.
>
> Michael O'Byrne
>
> PS to all others on all of the email lists that are cc'd I apologize for 
> my email list transgression.  Up here in Calgary when we clean out a barn 
> we do the whole thing.  :-)
>

Greetings,

I read the Body Reports religiously and have done so since before it was my 
job was Royal Counsel for Davin and Groa and the Crowns after.

Just to be safe I re-read all the ones online and it turns out I missed one.

That's right ONE.

It was in 2003.

Other than that, every single sanction related vote has been unanimous. Let 
me make it easier, in the notes looks for the term "opposed:none"

You will find that in all but that one vote in 2003 as far back as at least 
2000.

In Service,

Sir Daniel