[Artemisia] A New Debate - Pay to Play
L.J. Richards
xrichards at montana.com
Mon Nov 6 06:45:22 CST 2006
I hope we are spending time with the newer set!
Bronwen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Toni Jones" <destiny29us at yahoo.com>
To: "Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list" <artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Artemisia] A New Debate - Pay to Play
>I would like to make a comment on the award subject,
> for some people and award is nice and makes you proud
> but something that I would enjoy as much or more then
> an award is for someone to express some kind of
> interest in me as a person and maybe help me extend my
> interests into other areas. I personally think that
> maybe if more time was spent with the new people then
> maybe they would be a little more encouraged to pay
> for a membership, I know that I am a single parent and
> sometimes it is not easy to come up with such a small
> amount but I do it because I have hope that one day I
> will fit in somewhere with someone and will be worth
> some of their time.
>
> Thanks,
> Bianca
>
> --- Jeff Webster <red_belt at msn.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe that holding an office or fighting, it is
>> important to have a stake in the SCA. I think very
>> strongly about the issue if being a member and
>> holding an office, or fighting. As for
>> awards........rubbish!! I say it
>> again.......rubbish!! Awards are given to you by
>> recognition of your accomplishments, hard work and
>> effort. These are recommended by your peers and
>> given by your "royalty" This has nothing, absolutely
>> nothing to do with the "corporate SCA". I think
>> being required to be a card carrying member of the
>> SCA just to get recognition of what you, yourself
>> have given freely is absolute dung.
>>
>> Of course that is only my opinion,
>> I could be wrong
>>
>> Ulric
>> (not the seneschal Ulric, the citizen Ulric)
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chuck Heisler Jr.<mailto:conradvz at yahoo.com>
>>
>> To: Kingdom of Artemisia mailing
>> list<mailto:artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:51 AM
>> Subject: [Artemisia] A New Debate - Pay to Play
>>
>>
>> Greetings Artemisia,
>>
>> Here is a topic of discussion I'd like
>> Artemisians to consider and discuss (as rationally
>> as possible please).
>>
>> The concept of "Pay-to-Play". This means that
>> you would have to be a member of the SCA (any style
>> of membership allowed) before being allowed to
>> compete, fight, be an officer, vote on any subject,
>> etc.
>>
>> How does Artemisia feel about this subject?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Conrad von Zuberbuhler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Artemisia mailing list
>>
>>
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org<mailto:Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org>
>>
>>
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia<http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Artemisia mailing list
>> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
>>
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
>>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo!
> Groups
> (http://groups.yahoo.com)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Artemisia mailing list
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
>
More information about the Artemisia
mailing list