[Artemisia] A New Debate - Pay to Play
Kimi Singson
kimisuejoia at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 31 16:23:33 CST 2006
Responded to privately.
> That said, how much would a family membership be?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Rachel Lake
>
>
>On 10/31/06, IssacHutzel at aol.com <IssacHutzel at aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>I have played in a number of Kingdoms, some were "pay-to-play" some were
>>not. It has been my experience, that pay-to-play kingdoms tend to
>>have less
>>population. Whereas "free" kingdoms usually impose a tax, so to speak,
>>and charge
>>non-members more at the gate. These Kingdoms, baronies, shires, tend
>>to have
>>more money, (and population) due to these higher gate fees.
>>(I personally always figured that a membership was cheaper than higher
>>gate
>>fees for my wife and I)
>>
>>In either case , I don't believe I have ever seen a Kingdom where you
>>could hold office as a non-member. So really... it's 6 and 1/2 dozen.
>>Most people
>>in "free" Kingdoms stay non-members, until they decide it's just not
>>economical.
>>
>>
>>Heir Issac Hutzel Von Wuttenberg
>>Deputy KRM
>>of Artemisia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Artemisia mailing list
>>Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
>>http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Rachel Lake
>www.bengalgarden.com
>_______________________________________________
>Artemisia mailing list
>Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
>http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
_________________________________________________________________
Get today's hot entertainment gossip
http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip?icid=T002MSN03A07001
More information about the Artemisia
mailing list