[Artemisia] Grand Council Motion

[Richard Samul]

<boggle> ROTFL

I think that only you could could plan and execute this. Truly, I am  
in the presence of a master.

-- 
Earc

On Mar 19, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Catherine Helm-Clark wrote:

> Earc,
> the thing that is actually rather amusing to me is
> that this really _IS_ an official grand council
> motion (the motion is to include the "supplemental
> report" as an addendum to the regular official GC
> report - which is, no kidding, due on April 1 at
> the corporate office in Milpitas).  And it was really
> seconded as a motion officially over the weekend.
> According to GC procedure, as a seconded motion,
> there should be now an official vote on it - and votes
> take time.  When I wrote the silly thing, I was hoping
> that this might happen (being seconded and maybe
> even voted on for real) - and this is why it's two weeks
> early - because things up for vote need time to be
> voted on.  I was thinking it would be one of my better
> ploys if the document were really voted on officially
> for inclusion in the GC quarterly report.  I will be quite
> happy with the world if some our the humor-impaired
> self-important sticks-in-the-mud on the GC actually
> play along and vote on the silly thing.  ;-)
>
> ttfn
> Therasia