[Artemisia] arts and sciences
LadyPDC at aol.com
LadyPDC at aol.com
Thu Feb 21 01:23:15 CST 2008
In a message dated 2/20/2008 11:27:40 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
reuben_arwen at yahoo.com writes:
Is there a difference between what we think about these issues today and
what our personas would have thought? What makes you think so?
I can hear the crickets already... Esther
Well, I am too tired to answer more than one of your excellent questions in
one evening so I will just toss out an answer to the last one.
Much of what my persona would have thought about what she/I do as either an
art or a science would have simply been viewed by her as a necessity of both
life in the manor and a responsibility of her position. Would she have been
as careful to be exact in the creation of cordials, comfits, teas, etc. The
answer would have been yes and perhaps (if this is possible and some will say
that I go so overboard that it is not possible) she would have been even
more careful. Why? When I create something for either re-creation itself or
for a competition, my perfectionism is a matter of pride in my work. When
Constance creates something in period, she would have known that how she prepared
it, stored it, etc might well make a difference in whether she, her family,
and her retainers survive the next illness or injury. When I prepare food
from a recipe either for immediate consumption or for storage and later
consumption, I am doing it simply and mostly for the fun of it with some scholarly
adventure thrown in. Debbie or even the modern day Constance can get new
flour, sugar, salt, meat, etc if she makes a mistake and ruins a meal or even a
portion of this year's garden harvest. Constance in period would not have
that luxury. Again, she would know that what she preserved must suffice for all
in the manor and often serve to aid those in the lands about who were either
not so frugal or did not have the resources. She would also know that she
would need to have some extra laid by for any surprise visit of the overlord
or even higher royalty. Or she might be called upon to provide sustenance for
a military foray in the area. Such summons would not take into account
whether later local shortfalls would result. As lady of the manor and of the
area, Constance would know that she must plan for such things. Likewise, if
visitors arrived at any time, much of the area and household reputation would
hinge on the quality of everything from the meals to the cleanliness of the
holding to the linens and clothing worn by all from the lady to the lowest
servant. Constance would have to know all of these areas in order to instruct and
oversee the quality of the running of the household. Not only her
reputation, a really rather minor thing, but the reputation of her lord and of the hol
ding would rest much on this and reports of a poorly run holding could result
in the removal of the ruling family from said holdings.
In persona, Constance is not only lady of the manor but also of a family
whose wealth also derives from merchant trains. Because of this dual status,
she and her household would be viewed with some suspicion from both classes and
any slight failing would be blown out of proportion.
So, Debbie enjoys achieving as much accuracy as possible in the modern
times. For Constance, such knowledge and accuracy would be an absolute necessity
of her life. I think that she would also enjoy achieving a well run holding,
but I doubt that she would view it as even a science much less an art.
Debbie
Mistress Constance de la Rose, OL
Barony of Loch Salann
Kingdom of Artemisia
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
More information about the Artemisia
mailing list