[Artemisia] Pets question

[Richard Samul]

For all its tongue-in-cheekiness, this isn't actually a bad idea...

--  
Earc

On Jun 3, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Ken and Mindy Wilson wrote:

> The problem is that there's not really any way to tell the  
> responsible pet
> owners from the less-than-responsible ones.
> Perhaps some sort of authorization procedure for responsible pet  
> owners
> should be enacted at the kingdom level. It would naturally fall  
> under the
> auspices of the Regent of the Stables office. Territorial groups  
> could have
> warranted Pet Marshalls, and there could be marshals-at-large. The  
> pets
> would need to carry their authorization cards with them while at the  
> event,
> and owners would be required to show them at the reeve table when  
> they check
> in on site.
> Hey, it works for fighters. Mostly.
>
> -Marcello, who would much rather have to worry about a pet than  
> teenagers
> this Uprising.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard & Florence Evans
>
>
> I am also interested to know why responsible pet owners cannot bring  
> their
> pets to Uprising.
>
> Anna de Brabant
> Baroness, Loch Salann
>
> _______________________________________________
> Artemisia mailing list
> Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
> http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia