[Artemisia] Titles, Baronies and Artemisian History (oh, my!)
Jackman-Brink, Julia
Julia.Jackman-Brink at mso.umt.edu
Wed Oct 28 12:04:15 CDT 2009
Yes, Gefjon is correct....it was technically only a confidence polling for Dan (there were no other candidates). If the barony had not supported it, Cet probably would have stepped down. As it was they did support it, and Dan was invested soon after.
Juliana
-----Original Message-----
From: artemisia-bounces at lists.gallowglass.org [mailto:artemisia-bounces at lists.gallowglass.org] On Behalf Of Sondra Gibson
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:45 AM
To: Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list
Subject: Re: [Artemisia] Titles, Baronies and Artemisian History (oh, my!)
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Cet and Dan stand
> for an entirely new Polling, rather than Dan being chosen to
> complete a tenure with Cet? My memory is admittedly foggy
> swiss cheese these days, but I remember the events as
> follows- Cet and Guthrum were chosen as Premier Baron and
> Baroness; personal issues arose, leading to Guthrum not being
> able to complete His duties *in his opinion*, thus Guthrum
> decided to step down; cet decided to serve out the Tenure as
> solo Baroness rather than go through the Vicar process; at
> the end of that original Tenure, Cet submitted for the new
> Polling with Dan, rather than continuing as Baroness and
> having a Polling for new Baron.
>
> Of course, I could be wrong.
>
> Morgan
In my memory, the 2nd polling was on Dan as baron. I don't remember it
including Cet, but I've slept since then...
However the numbers that I listed agree with the numbers given by her
Magesty, and with the listings in the on-line OP. Not that it matters all
that much...
Gefjon
_______________________________________________
Artemisia mailing list
Artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org
http://lists.gallowglass.org/mailman/listinfo/artemisia
More information about the Artemisia
mailing list