<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tempus Sans ITC'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">> The thought for discussion- how do you define "Prowess" for each of the</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tempus Sans ITC'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">> Peerages?</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I think rather than doing specific definitions you may want to consider "Prowess" as being the measuring stick that everybody uses to compare themselves against. More of the �I want to be 'THAT GOOD' kind of attitude.�<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Void of any other consideration, is the individual talented in the discipline or not?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">In my opinion, those who define �Prowess� for their discipline (with some rare & noted exceptions) probably should be peers.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because competition creates a better product and it�s the best of the fighters, costumers and other disciplines that pushes the SCA forward.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Michael<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree">Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard</a>