[Artemisia] Some clarification of the Grand Council Discussions

[yumitori]

> According to the Utah Supreme Court a waiver doesn't
> entirely protect an organization.  The recent ruling
> stated somebody could sue despite signing a waiver
> under very specific situations.  Just because you
> signed a waiver doesn't mean you can't sue the SCA.
> The fact that the Utah Supreme Court rule on the issue
> should prove that point.

> Michael

No it doesn't. Most anyone can sue most any time. But it does
demonstrate that the person signing had some idea what they were
getting into, or should have, since it's all spelled out there in the
documents.

So that when some bozo decides to sue the SCA 'cause he got an owie
(Yes, it's happened), the chances of *winning* the lawsuit are lower.
'What? you mean that people hitting each other with big honkin' sticks
might have some risk involved? Heavens Above! Who ever knew?'

-- 
Ron/yumitori

Not all who wander are lost,
http://www.geocaching.com/

Loyal worshiper of Ashtara (Cha Cha Cha!)
http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/index.php