[Artemisia] Re: thought for discussion-

[John Johnson]

> It sounds to me like you are asking for *how much*     > Prowess, or whatever someone should have.  Or          > optionally which factors of Prowess *must* a candidate > have. 

It's a question that many people have and it's one of the reasons I suspect why the 4th Peerage proposal was submitted to the BOD.  Always been a bit of a curiousity to me as I've met a few people who defined prowess and has me scrtaching my head wondering why they aren't peers.

Michael



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gallowglass.org/pipermail/artemisia/attachments/20031107/8e69dd7c/attachment.htm