[Artemisia] Re: NOW Richard III vs. the Upstart

[L.J. Richards]

Since the party telling the supposed true story about Richard III was in the 
pocket of the "winning side"  I don't find that to be clear and sufficient 
evidence to convict Richard III - especially by someone called Henry VIII!

HE Bronwen
(and who, she said, is the Daughter of Time?)
(and His Grace was quite right about that "upstart") (so there!)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "morgan wolf" <morganblaidddu at yahoo.com>
To: "Kingdom of Artemisia mailing list" <artemisia at lists.gallowglass.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Artemisia] Enough on the school thing


His Grace posited-  Or how about that upstart Tudor (with NO royal English 
blood)
overthrowing Richard the Third?

How can one even doubt who to support?  Richard Plantagenet planted 
poisonous words in good King Edward's ear to get the brother between them, 
poor George, executed for treason, then played on Edward's guilt to lead him 
to drink himself to death, then had Edward's sons declared illegitimate so 
that he could take the Throne for himself!  The same sons of Edward that 
went into the Tower ad Richard's command, and were never seen again!  It is 
also said that the miserable hunchback Richard then poinsoned his own wife 
to free him to have his way with his own niece, Edward's daughter Elizabeth!

Henry Tudor, on the other hand, was of right noble blood, and recognized the 
legitimacy of Edward's children.  He is no usurper, but instead righted the 
wrongs of the heinous Richard, by putting Edward's daughter on the Throne as 
Queen.  Of course, a Queen should have a noble and righteous King by her 
side, and who better than a Welshman?

All men of Honor and Chivalry (you know, the Welsh) support Henry Tudor, and 
so do many Englishmen!

Morgan Blaidd Du
Cymru am Byth!!