[Artemisia] thought for discussion-

[John Johnson]

> The thought for discussion- how do you define "Prowess" for each of the

> Peerages?

I think rather than doing specific definitions you may want to consider "Prowess" as being the measuring stick that everybody uses to compare themselves against.  More of the “I want to be 'THAT GOOD' kind of attitude.”  Void of any other consideration, is the individual talented in the discipline or not?

In my opinion, those who define “Prowess” for their discipline (with some rare & noted exceptions) probably should be peers.  Why?  Because competition creates a better product and it’s the best of the fighters, costumers and other disciplines that pushes the SCA forward.  

Michael



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gallowglass.org/pipermail/artemisia/attachments/20031105/814b6055/attachment.htm